Comments for Florida IP Trends http://floridaiptrends.com Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:24:34 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Goofy Little Chicken? by Southern Cal beats up on South Carolina… in a trademark dispute | TacticalIP.com http://floridaiptrends.com/2010/01/22/goofy-little-chicken/#comment-537 Southern Cal beats up on South Carolina… in a trademark dispute | TacticalIP.com Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:24:34 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=182#comment-537 [...] of the wrong team.  Just ask Kevin Wimberly, over at Florida IP Trends, if he wants a McDonald’s themed Gamecocks hat. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter.  [...] [...] of the wrong team.  Just ask Kevin Wimberly, over at Florida IP Trends, if he wants a McDonald’s themed Gamecocks hat. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter.  [...]

]]> Comment on Floridians 3rd Most Active in Trademark Applications by Floridians still 3rd most active TM filers, but volume is down « Florida IP Trends http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/24/floridians-3rd-most-active-in-trademark-applications/#comment-529 Floridians still 3rd most active TM filers, but volume is down « Florida IP Trends Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:05:20 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=105#comment-529 [...] previously posted the FY2008  statistics for Floridians filing trademark applications, and here’s the update. [...] [...] previously posted the FY2008  statistics for Floridians filing trademark applications, and here’s the update. [...]

]]> Comment on Featured Case: Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Timmy Woods Beverly Hills, Ltd. et al by jfischer1975 http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/05/07/featured-case-rudolph-and-me-inc-v-timmy-woods-beverly-hills-ltd-et-al/#comment-484 jfischer1975 Tue, 12 May 2009 00:51:33 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=115#comment-484 Reminds me a bit of this case: <a href="http://www.coolcopyright.com/cases/chp2/batlinsnyder.htm" rel="nofollow">L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. Snyder</a> Reminds me a bit of this case:

L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. Snyder

]]> Comment on Featured Case: Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Timmy Woods Beverly Hills, Ltd. et al by The Obama Bag « Florida IP Trends http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/05/07/featured-case-rudolph-and-me-inc-v-timmy-woods-beverly-hills-ltd-et-al/#comment-483 The Obama Bag « Florida IP Trends Fri, 08 May 2009 15:39:03 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=115#comment-483 [...] The Obama Bag Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Trademarks No Comments  As mentioned in the Featured Case post, when I was exploring the Timmy Woods website to look for the allegedly infringing snowman purse, I [...] [...] The Obama Bag Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Trademarks No Comments  As mentioned in the Featured Case post, when I was exploring the Timmy Woods website to look for the allegedly infringing snowman purse, I [...]

]]> Comment on Something smells shrimpy in the Southern District by jrothman http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/12/something-smells-shrimpy-in-the-southern-district/#comment-482 jrothman Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:39:59 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=91#comment-482 I'm not familiar with the Leval, J. decision on squishiness. Could we get a cite? I’m not familiar with the Leval, J. decision on squishiness. Could we get a cite?

]]> Comment on Latin Hooters by Latin Hooters - UPDATE « Florida IP Trends http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/03/latin-hooters/#comment-477 Latin Hooters - UPDATE « Florida IP Trends Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:31:35 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=73#comment-477 [...] 25, 2009 Latin Hooters - UPDATE Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Uncategorized   Well, as predicted, the Applicant for “LatinHooter’s” failed to respond to the Office Action in [...] [...] 25, 2009 Latin Hooters - UPDATE Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Uncategorized   Well, as predicted, the Applicant for “LatinHooter’s” failed to respond to the Office Action in [...]

]]> Comment on Latin Hooters by hbh http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/03/latin-hooters/#comment-474 hbh Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:16:58 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=73#comment-474 Et tu, Brute? (subtle, wait for it ...) Et tu, Brute?
(subtle, wait for it …)

]]> Comment on Something smells shrimpy in the Southern District by hbh http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/12/something-smells-shrimpy-in-the-southern-district/#comment-473 hbh Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:14:08 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=91#comment-473 crocs are squishy. squishy things deserve greater IP protection. Its a rule. Pierre Leval says so. crocs are squishy. squishy things deserve greater IP protection. Its a rule. Pierre Leval says so.

]]> Comment on Something smells shrimpy in the Southern District by The Other Half http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/03/12/something-smells-shrimpy-in-the-southern-district/#comment-456 The Other Half Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:11:44 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=91#comment-456 http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Pepe_the_King_Prawn http://muppet.wikia.com/wiki/Pepe_the_King_Prawn

]]> Comment on Featured Case – Great Neck Saw Manufacturers by Something smells shrimpy in the Southern District « Florida IP Trends http://floridaiptrends.com/2009/02/19/featured-case-great-neck-saw-manufacturers/#comment-455 Something smells shrimpy in the Southern District « Florida IP Trends Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:22:44 +0000 http://floridaiptrends.com/?p=35#comment-455 [...] Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Featured Case, Patents   If you remember the very first post on Florida IP Trends, you’ll know that one of the things I’m interested in tracking is [...] [...] Posted by Kevin Wimberly under Featured Case, Patents   If you remember the very first post on Florida IP Trends, you’ll know that one of the things I’m interested in tracking is [...]

]]>